Mezzanine Financing: A Hybrid Debt Solution
Mezzanine financing provides companies with the ability to raise funds for specific projects or for the selective acquisition by offering a form of debt and equity financing. Beyond this, mezzanine financing is also embedded in mezzanine funds. The latter represent a sort of pooled investment, again like a mutual fund, granting financing under the guise of mezzanine financing with significantly qualified businesses. This form of financing can provide greater returns to investors than corporate debt, which may pay as much as 12% to 30% per annum. Mezzanine loans are most commonly utilized in the growth expansion of existing businesses and not as start-up or early-stage capital. Both mezzanine financing and preferred equity can be taken out and retired with lower-interest financing if the market interest rate declines significantly.
How it works:
Mezzanine financing fills the
gap between debt financing and equity financing and is considered one of the
highest risk forms of debt. It ranks higher than pure equity but lower than
pure debt. But this also means that it can offer some of the highest returns to
investors in debt, since it often enjoys rates from 12% to 20% a year, and
sometimes as high as 30%. Mezzanine finance is also considered very expensive
debt or cheaper equity, as it carries a higher interest rate than the senior
debt that companies would otherwise obtain through their banks but is
substantially less expensive than equity in terms of the overall cost of
capital. It also impacts the company's share value less than equity does.
Ultimately, mezzanine financing lets a business own more capital and thus
increase its returns on equity.
Structure of Mezzanine Financing:
Mezzanine financing provides a
place within a company's capital structure between the senior debt and its
common stock, represented either as subordinated debt or preferred equity, or
some form of both. Subordinated non-cash collateralized debt is the most
typical mezzanine financing structure. It, known as sub-debt, is an unsecured
bond or loan that ranks below the higher-ranking loans or securities in its
ability to claim against company assets or earnings. Sub-debt holders are not
paid out before all other senior debt holders are paid in the event of a
borrower default. This being an unsecured sub-debt means that the debt is only
backed by the promise to pay by the firm.
Maturity and transferability:
In general, Mezzanine financing
has maturity in more than five years.
The maturity date of any particular issue of debt or equity, however, is
usually determined by the scheduled maturities of outstanding debt in the
issuer's financing structure.
Generally, the lender under
mezzanine financing has an unfettered right to transfer its loan. However, when
future distributions or advances are part of the loan, the borrower may be able
to negotiate a qualified transferee standard as a limitation on the borrower's
right to transfer.
Advantages:
Mezzanine financing may involve
lenders, or investors, acquiring direct equity in a business or warrants to buy
equity in the future. This can also significantly boost an investor's rate of
return (ROR). Lastly, mezzanine financing providers are scheduled to receive
contractually obligated interest payments made monthly, quarterly, or annually.
The main interest of borrowers in mezzanine debt is the interest they pay. It's
a tax-deductible business expense, so the actual cost of the debt is much
lower. Furthermore, mezzanine financing is much easier on other debt
structures. Borrowers can restructure their interest to the balance of the
loan. Some or even the entire interest may be left out if a borrower cannot
make his scheduled interest payment. This is typically not the case for other
types of debt.
Disadvantages:
Owners lose some control and potential upside in mezzanine financing due to the
loss of equity. Lenders may also have a longer-term view and require a seat on
the board. Owners pay more in interest the longer that mezzanine financing is
in place. Loan agreements will also often include restrictive covenants that
limit the borrower's ability to obtain further financing or to refinance senior
debt and may also establish the debtor-specific financial ratios that a
borrower must attain. Payout restrictions on major employees and even owners
are also not unusual.
Conclusion:
Comments
Post a Comment